FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 860M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 860M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 860M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 433% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W7100 is 123 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTX 860M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tonga | N15P-GX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 August 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,000 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 690
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 690
- FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- FirePro W7100 vs Radeon Pro 555X
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 555X