FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 860M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 860M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 860M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 860M is 47 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 860M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 89% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
Code name | RV770 | N15P-GX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |