GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 860M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 860M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 860M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 285% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 860M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 860M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 860M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 445 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 860M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Battlefield 5 is 236% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 860M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 108% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Dota 2 is 82% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Far Cry 5 is 228% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Fortnite is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Forza Horizon 4 is 225% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Grand Theft Auto V is 130% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Minecraft is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 230% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 860M in World of Tanks is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 860M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GT200B | N15P-GX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 797 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 1152 or 640 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon Pro 555X
- GeForce GTX 860M vs GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
- GeForce GTX 860M vs Radeon Pro 555X