GeForce GTX 860M vs P104 100
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 860M and P104 100 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 860M will be the best choice, for others P104 100 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
P104 100
GeForce GTX 860M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 860M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 860M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | P104 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 860M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P104 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 860M and P104 100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 860M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 860M is build with Maxwell architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 810 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 860M.
- GeForce GTX 860M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−105 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 104% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 107% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 860M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 860M | P104 100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | N15P-GX | GP104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 12 December 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1920 |
Core clock speed | 797 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Boost Clock | 915 MHz | 1733 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 7,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 208.0 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 10008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.0 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 1152 or 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |