FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 870M
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 870M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 870M.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 870M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 870M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 870M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 191 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 870M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 142% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Kepler |
Code name | RV770 | N15P-GT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 941 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 108.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 120.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |