GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GTX 870M
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 870M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and GeForce GTX 870M.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 189% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 870M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1786 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 870M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 870M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 301 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 870M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 86% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 242% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | GeForce GTX 870M | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Kepler |
Code name | GT200B | N15P-GT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 240 | 1344 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 941 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 108.3 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 2,599 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 120.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | 1344 |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | + |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |