GeForce GTX 870M vs Iris Plus Graphics 645
When comparing GeForce GTX 870M and Iris Plus Graphics 645, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 870M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 870M and Iris Plus Graphics 645 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M or Iris Plus Graphics 645 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Power consumption (TDP)
100 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x1
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
6 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 870M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 645 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 870M is 641 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 645 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
16−18
4−5
ultra / 1080p
10−11
2−3
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 250% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
24−27
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
4K / 2160p
6−7
−
low / 720p
60−65
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Battlefield 5 is 263% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
50−55
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
220−230
100−110
medium / 768p
190−200
80−85
ultra / 1080p
100−110
35−40
QHD / 1440p
65−70
24−27
4K / 2160p
35−40
−
high / 768p
150−160
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 140% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
45−50
12−14
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
110−120
65−70
medium / 768p
100−110
45−50
ultra / 1080p
70−75
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Dota 2 is 115% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
21−24
5−6
ultra / 1080p
18−20
5−6
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
6−7
3−4
low / 720p
45−50
12−14
medium / 1080p
21−24
5−6
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Far Cry 5 is 283% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
27−30
12−14
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
110−120
45−50
medium / 1080p
60−65
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Fortnite is 185% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
30−33
8−9
ultra / 1080p
21−24
−
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
low / 720p
60−65
16−18
medium / 1080p
30−35
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 281% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
95−100
40−45
medium / 768p
85−90
35−40
high / 1080p
35−40
7−8
ultra / 1080p
14−16
5−6
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 156% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
10−12
3−4
ultra / 1080p
8−9
2−3
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
35−40
7−8
medium / 1080p
14−16
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Metro Exodus is 350% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
110−120
85−90
high / 1080p
−
80−85
ultra / 1080p
−
70−75
medium / 1080p
110−120
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
24−27
medium / 1080p
18−20
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 73% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
9−10
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
30−35
7−8
medium / 1080p
18−20
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
16−18
medium / 768p
40−45
12−14
high / 1080p
21−24
6−7
ultra / 1080p
12−14
5−6
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 260% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
90−95
80−85
medium / 768p
60−65
35−40
ultra / 1080p
35−40
14−16
high / 768p
55−60
30−33
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 870M in World of Tanks is 51% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Architecture
Kepler
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
Code name
N15P-GT
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
12 March 2014
10 July 2019
Pipelines
1344
48
Core clock speed
941 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
967 MHz
1150 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
108.3
50.40
Floating-point performance
2,599 gflops
Memory bus width
192 Bit
Memory bandwidth
120.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1344
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
82 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price