GeForce GTX 870M vs P106 100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 870M and P106 100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 870M stacks up against P106 100, check out specs charts below.
P106 100
GeForce GTX 870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 870M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | P106 100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- P106 100 has 20% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and P106 100 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 870M and P106 100 have maximum RAM of 6 GB.
- GeForce GTX 870M is used in Laptops, and P106 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 870M is build with Kepler architecture, and P106 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P106 100 is 565 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 870M.
- GeForce GTX 870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P106 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 870M and P106 100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTX 870M and P106 100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Far Cry 5 is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Fortnite is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Metro Exodus is 121% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 106% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of P106 100 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 870M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 870M | P106 100 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
Code name | N15P-GT | GP106 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 19 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 1344 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 941 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Boost Clock | 967 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
Texture fill rate | 108.3 | 136.7 |
Floating-point performance | 2,599 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Length | 250 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 120.0 GB/s | 192.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | 6.1 |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |