FirePro M4150 vs GeForce GTX 880M
In this comparison between FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 880M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4150 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 880M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M4150
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 239 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 880M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 388% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M4150 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 141% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 237% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 385% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 33% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 61% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M4150 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Opal | N15E-GX-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 16 October 2013 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.16 | 127.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |