FirePro S7000 vs GeForce GTX 880M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S7000 stacks up against GeForce GTX 880M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S7000
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 has 186% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 4 GB more memory, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 4 MHz higher, than FirePro S7000.
- FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 230−240 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 200−210 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 170−180 | 160−170 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FirePro S7000 and GeForce GTX 880M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro S7000 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Pitcairn | N15E-GX-A2 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 127.1 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
| Length | 292 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | 96 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Check Price |