FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GTX 880M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 880M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GTX 880M.
FirePro V5800
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 122 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 880M has 64% more power consumption, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 880M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 7 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 880M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 880M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 264 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 880M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 212% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 215% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 104% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 39% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 89% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 142% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 128% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 30% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 155% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 215% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 36% more, than FirePro V5800. |
Full Specs
FirePro V5800 | GeForce GTX 880M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Juniper | N15E-GX-A2 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 26 April 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 954 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 127.1 |
Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |