GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 7 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K160Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 104 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 580% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 1000% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 32% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 160% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 900% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 326% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 642% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 183% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 43% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 118% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 3600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 3−4 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1600% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 85% more, than GRID K160Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |