GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID K260Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K260Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 880M will be the best choice, for others GRID K260Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K260Q
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 6 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and GRID K260Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K260Q are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K260Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 40% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 34% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 28% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 41% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 2% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 36% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |