GeForce GTX 880M vs GRID K520
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K520, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 880M stacks up against GRID K520, check out specs charts below.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 84% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 880M.
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 4 GB more memory, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K520 are build with Kepler architecture.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 209 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 35% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 24% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 16% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 11% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 23% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 17% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 18% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 21% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
GeForce GTX 880M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 16% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GRID K520. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 880M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |