GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon Pro Vega 16
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 880M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 16 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M or Radeon Pro Vega 16 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Power consumption (TDP)
122 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
HBM2
Maximum RAM amount
8 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 880M has 62% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro Vega 16 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 880M has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro Vega 16.
GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - with Vega.
GeForce GTX 880M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 16 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
14−16
QHD / 1440p
6−7
9−10
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
24−27
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
27−30
30−35
QHD / 1440p
12−14
18−20
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Battlefield 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
230−240
240−250
medium / 768p
200−210
210−220
ultra / 1080p
120−130
130−140
QHD / 1440p
90−95
100−110
4K / 2160p
50−55
60−65
high / 768p
160−170
180−190
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
50−55
−
medium / 1080p
55−60
55−60
GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 768p
100−110
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
QHD / 1440p
18−20
21−24
4K / 2160p
8−9
9−10
low / 720p
50−55
60−65
medium / 1080p
27−30
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Far Cry 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
30−35
35−40
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−33
QHD / 1440p
16−18
18−20
low / 720p
120−130
130−140
medium / 1080p
70−75
80−85
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Fortnite is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
35−40
40−45
ultra / 1080p
24−27
30−35
QHD / 1440p
14−16
18−20
4K / 2160p
12−14
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
75−80
medium / 1080p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Forza Horizon 4 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
100−110
110−120
medium / 768p
90−95
100−110
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
ultra / 1080p
16−18
20−22
QHD / 1440p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
12−14
16−18
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
10−11
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
4−5
low / 720p
40−45
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Metro Exodus is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
120−130
120−130
medium / 1080p
110−120
110−120
GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon Pro Vega 16 have the same average FPS in Minecraft.
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
80−85
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
high / 1080p
14−16
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−11
12−14
QHD / 1440p
1−2
4−5
4K / 2160p
1−2
3−4
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
21−24
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
high / 1080p
24−27
30−33
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
4K / 2160p
8−9
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
low / 768p
90−95
90−95
medium / 768p
60−65
60−65
ultra / 1080p
40−45
45−50
high / 768p
55−60
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 16 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 880M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Architecture
Kepler
Vega
Code name
N15E-GX-A2
Vega Mobile
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
12 March 2014
15 November 2018
Pipelines
1536
1024
Core clock speed
954 MHz
Boost Clock
993 MHz
1190 MHz
Transistor count
3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
127.1
76.16
Floating-point performance
3,050 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
1024 Bit
Memory clock speed
2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
160.0 GB/s
307.2 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
1536
Bus support
PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
96 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Check Price
Check Price
