GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R7 A265
When comparing GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 A265, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 A265 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 229 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 528% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 A265 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | − |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 151% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 700% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 300% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 487% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 1100% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 720% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2014 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 780M
- GeForce GTX 880M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 780M
- Radeon R7 A265 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics