GeForce GTX 880M vs Radeon R7 M270DX
When choosing between GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 M270DX, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 M270DX.
Radeon R7 M270DX
GeForce GTX 880M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 880M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 880M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 122 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 880M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTX 880M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M270DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 880M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M270DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 880M is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270DX.
- GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 M270DX are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 383% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Battlefield 5 is 450% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 880M and Radeon R7 M270DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 90−95 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 145% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Dota 2 is 116% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Fortnite is 233% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Forza Horizon 4 is 385% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Metro Exodus is 700% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Minecraft is 33% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 516% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 9−10 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 580% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 880M in World of Tanks is 65% more, than Radeon R7 M270DX. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 880M | Radeon R7 M270DX | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N15E-GX-A2 | Topaz |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 March 2014 | 11 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | 940 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 127.1 | 22.56 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,050 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 1536 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 96 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |