GeForce GTX 765M vs GeForce GTX 950A
When choosing between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 950A, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 950A.
GeForce GTX 950A
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 950A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 765M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 950A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 765M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 950A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 143 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 950A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 2 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 765M and GeForce GTX 950A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 765M | GeForce GTX 950A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14-GE | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 30 May 2013 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 993 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,540 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 55.23 | 44.96 |
Floating-point performance | 1,326 gflops | 1,271 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | 2002 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64.0 GB/s | 32.03 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro 5000
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 5000
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU