GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950A will be the best choice, for others Iris Pro Graphics 5200 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 66% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 126 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 793 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 23% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 29% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 31% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | GM107 | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon RX 550X
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book