GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
When choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
GeForce GTX 950A
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 6200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 6200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
Memory type | DDR3 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 693 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Pro Graphics 6200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 128% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 90% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 130% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 95% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 150% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 6200. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
Code name | GM107 | Broadwell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 40.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 883.2 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.80 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 7770M
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Radeon HD 7770M
- Iris Pro Graphics 6200 vs Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2