GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
When choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 950A and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
GeForce GTX 950A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 593 MHz higher, than Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs - by 10 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 91% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Battlefield 5 is 90% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 170−180 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Cyberpunk 2077 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Dota 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Far Cry 5 is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Fortnite is 64% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Forza Horizon 4 is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Grand Theft Auto V is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Minecraft is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 80% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 11 Ice Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Tiger Lake Xe |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 15 August 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 10 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 12_1 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M470
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M395
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs vs Radeon R9 M395