GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K3000M

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950A will be the best choice, for others Quadro K3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 950A

Quadro K3000M Check Price

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K3000M here:

Quadro K3000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro K3000M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	75 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K3000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Quadro K3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro K3000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 339 MHz higher, than Quadro K3000M.
GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K3000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Quadro K3000M is 798 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	7−8
ultra / 1080p	7−8	4−5
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	20−22	12−14
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 950A and Quadro K3000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	190−200	140−150
medium / 768p	150−160	120−130
ultra / 1080p	80−85	55−60
QHD / 1440p	45−50	30−35
4K / 2160p	30−33	27−30
high / 768p	120−130	90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 32% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
medium / 768p	80−85	65−70
ultra / 1080p	50−55	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	14−16	9−10
ultra / 1080p	12−14	8−9
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	10−12
low / 720p	85−90	65−70
medium / 1080p	40−45	27−30
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Fortnite is 35% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
QHD / 1440p	6−7	2−3
low / 720p	40−45	27−30
medium / 1080p	24−27	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	75−80	55−60
medium / 768p	65−70	50−55
high / 1080p	24−27	14−16
ultra / 1080p	10−11	7−8
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	8−9	5−6
ultra / 1080p	6−7	3−4
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	10−11	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	100−110	95−100
high / 1080p	−	90−95
ultra / 1080p	95−100	80−85
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Minecraft is 10% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Quadro K3000M.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	14−16
medium / 1080p	14−16	10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	45−50	27−30
medium / 768p	27−30	18−20
high / 1080p	14−16	10−11
ultra / 1080p	9−10	7−8
4K / 2160p	7−8	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro K3000M.
low / 768p	95−100	85−90
medium / 768p	55−60	45−50
ultra / 1080p	30−33	21−24
high / 768p	45−50	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Quadro K3000M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 950A	Quadro K3000M
Architecture	Maxwell	Kepler
Code name	GM107	N14E-Q1
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 March 2015	1 June 2012
Pipelines	640	576
Core clock speed	993 MHz	654 MHz
Boost Clock	1124 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	44.96	31.39
Floating-point performance	1,271 gflops	753.4 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2002 MHz	2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.03 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	5.0	+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		24 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
Optimus		+
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro K3000M

Quadro K3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares