GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro 460
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro 460, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 950A stacks up against Radeon Pro 460, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 950A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 93 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 2998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 907 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro 460 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon Pro 460 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs FirePro W8000
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 750
- Radeon Pro 460 vs FirePro W8000
- Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 750