GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon PRO WX 3100
When choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 3100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 3100.
GeForce GTX 950A
Radeon PRO WX 3100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 3100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 3100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 3100.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 3100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 3100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 3100 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Battlefield 5 is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon PRO WX 3100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Dota 2 is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Far Cry 5 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Fortnite is 7% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 3100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon PRO WX 3100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 21 March 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce GTX 770M
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Quadro 6000
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 770M
- Radeon PRO WX 3100 vs Quadro 6000