GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
When comparing GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 950A
Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 3200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 950A has 15% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
- GeForce GTX 950A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 89 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3998 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Battlefield 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon Pro WX 3200 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon Pro WX 3200 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 26 September 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 1082 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 41.44 |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs GeForce MX250
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon HD 6850 X2
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce MX250
- Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Radeon HD 6850 X2