GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M395
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R9 M395 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M395 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 950A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R9 M395 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M395 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M395 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon R9 M395 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950A.
- GeForce GTX 950A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M395 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 950A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M395 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 159 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
- GeForce GTX 950A and Radeon R9 M395 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 950A is 752 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M395.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M395 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950A | Radeon R9 M395 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 9 June 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 993 MHz | 834 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5000 Million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,271 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32.03 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | + |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 336 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
TrueAudio | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon R9 M470
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon R9 M470
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- GeForce GTX 950A vs Radeon Sky 500
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
- Radeon R9 M395 vs Radeon Sky 500