FirePro S10000 vs GeForce GTX 950M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 950M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 950M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FirePro S10000
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 750 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S10000 has 900% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- FirePro S10000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 950M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S10000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- FirePro S10000 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 950M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S10000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GTX 950M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 89 MHz higher, than FirePro S10000.
- FirePro S10000 and GeForce GTX 950M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S10000 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 59% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Fortnite is 123% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 113% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S10000 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S10000 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | Tahiti | N16P-GT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 12 November 2012 | 12 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 4096 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 914 MHz |
Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1124 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 106.4 | 44.96 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 3,405 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
Length | 305 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 480 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 383 Mh/s | 140 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |