FireStream 9270 vs GeForce GTX 950M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 950M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 950M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 or GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 113% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 950M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950M has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 950M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTX 950M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 164 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 950M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 116% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 115% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and GeForce GTX 950M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 45% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 92% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 106% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 65% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | GeForce GTX 950M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N16P-GT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 12 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 914 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 44.96 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,439 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1000 or 2500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 32 or 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |