GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID K160Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K160Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950M will be the best choice, for others GRID K160Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 73% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950M has 3 GB more memory, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 64 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K160Q are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K160Q is 782 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 650% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 123% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 107% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 575% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 204% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 414% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 108% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 20% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 87% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 2400% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 3−4 |
| medium / 768p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 76% more, than GRID K160Q. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16P-GT | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 1782 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |