GeForce GTX 950M vs GRID K520
When comparing GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K520, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K520 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K520
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K520 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 169 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 4000 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950M and GRID K520 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | GRID K520 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | N16P-GT | GK104 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 745 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |