GeForce GTX 950M vs Tesla M2070 Q
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M2070 Q, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 950M stacks up against Tesla M2070 Q, check out specs charts below.
Tesla M2070 Q
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 950M is 340 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 950M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 2132 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Fortnite is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 950M in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | N16P-GT | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |