GeForce GTX 950M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 950M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTX 950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 950M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M6 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3 or GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M6 has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 950M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 16 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
- GeForce GTX 950M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 4012 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 90−95 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 141% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 187% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 30−33 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 204% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 950M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 950M | Tesla M6 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | N16P-GT | GM204 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 30 August 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 914 MHz | 930 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 5,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.96 | 113.3 |
Floating-point performance | 1,439 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 or 2500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 32 or 80 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.2 |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 2.5 Mh/s | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |