FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 960A
In this comparison between FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 960A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M4000 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 960A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
FirePro M4000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M4000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M4000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 127% more power consumption, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTX 960A uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTX 960A - in Desktops.
- FirePro M4000 is build with GCN architecture, and GeForce GTX 960A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 429 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
- FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 960A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 512 MHz higher, than FirePro M4000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4000 and GeForce GTX 960A have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 35% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 10% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than FirePro M4000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than FirePro M4000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4000 | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Cape Verde GLM | GM107 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 512 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 80.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bus support | n/a | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 79 Mh/s | 180 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-A | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K3000M
- FirePro M4000 vs Quadro K2000D
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro K3000M
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro K2000D
- FirePro M4000 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- FirePro M4000 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI