GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 960A
When comparing GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 960A, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 960A is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 32 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory type | DDR3\GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 134% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- GeForce GT 645M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 960A uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 960A have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GT 645M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 960A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 645M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 960A - with Maxwell.
- GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 960A are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 3212 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 285% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GT 645M and GeForce GTX 960A have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 73% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 145% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 262% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 550% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 300% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 360% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 52% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 645M | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N13P-GS | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 22 March 2012 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 22.7 billion/sec | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 544.5 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | 180 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI