GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960A
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q and GeForce GTX 960A you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 960A will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 960A uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 960A - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is build with Turing architecture, and GeForce GTX 960A - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 9 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 960A - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q | GeForce GTX 960A | |
Architecture | Turing | Maxwell |
Code name | N18P-G0 / N18P-G61 | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 23 April 2019 | 13 March 2015 |
Pipelines | 1024 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1020 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1245 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 43.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s | 80.19 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 7.5 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon R9 280X
- GeForce GTX 960A vs FirePro W7100
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI