GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce MX350
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and GeForce MX350 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX350 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce MX350 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX350 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX350 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce MX350 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 20 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 275% more power consumption, than GeForce MX350.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GeForce MX350 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A and GeForce MX350 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX350 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and GeForce MX350 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 325 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX350 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX350 is 1988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and GeForce MX350 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Fortnite is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Metro Exodus is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 14% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX350 in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | GeForce MX350 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
Code name | GM107 | N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 20 February 2020 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1354 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1468 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 29.98 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 6.1 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce MX350 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce MX350 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce GTX 960A vs FirePro W5000
- GeForce MX350 vs Quadro M1000M
- GeForce MX350 vs FirePro W5000