GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Iris Plus Graphics 650 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Iris Plus Graphics 650 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
Iris Plus Graphics 650 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 650 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 30 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 729 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Iris Plus Graphics 650 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 23% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 35% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 37% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 29% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 66% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 33% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Iris Plus Graphics 650 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake |
Code name | GM107 | Kaby Lake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 3 January 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 55.20 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 883 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.103 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon R9 M385X
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 650
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- Iris Plus Graphics 650 vs GeForce GTX 650