GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 5010M

In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 5010M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Quadro 5010M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTX 960A

Quadro 5010M Check Price

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro 5010M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 5010M here:

Quadro 5010M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTX 960A	Quadro 5010M
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5 ECC
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
		Check Price

Quadro 5010M has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Both video cards are using MXM-B (3.0) interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro 5010M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro 5010M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro 5010M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 579 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.
GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro 5010M - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 3712 MHz higher, than Quadro 5010M.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	9−10
ultra / 1080p	7−8	6−7
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	21−24
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	20−22	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	3−4	0−1
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 19% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro 5010M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	180−190	160−170
medium / 768p	150−160	130−140
ultra / 1080p	80−85	70−75
QHD / 1440p	45−50	40−45
4K / 2160p	30−33	30−33
high / 768p	120−130	100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 14% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	55−60	55−60
ultra / 1080p	30−35	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	100−110	90−95
medium / 768p	80−85	70−75
ultra / 1080p	50−55	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	14−16	10−12
ultra / 1080p	12−14	10−11
4K / 2160p	5−6	4−5
low / 720p	30−35	24−27
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 33% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	85−90	75−80
medium / 1080p	40−45	30−35
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 20% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	21−24	16−18
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
QHD / 1440p	6−7	4−5
low / 720p	40−45	35−40
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 22% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	75−80	65−70
medium / 768p	65−70	55−60
high / 1080p	21−24	18−20
ultra / 1080p	10−11	8−9
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	8−9	6−7
ultra / 1080p	6−7	5−6
4K / 2160p	2−3	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	10−11	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	100−110	100−110
ultra / 1080p	95−100	90−95
medium / 1080p	100−110	95−100
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 4% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	20−22	18−20
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	45−50	40−45
medium / 1080p	21−24	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro 5010M.
high / 1080p	12−14	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	21−24	18−20
medium / 1080p	14−16	12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	40−45	35−40
medium / 768p	27−30	21−24
high / 1080p	14−16	12−14
ultra / 1080p	9−10	8−9
4K / 2160p	7−8	7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 17% more, than Quadro 5010M.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	50−55
ultra / 1080p	30−33	24−27
high / 768p	45−50	40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 9% more, than Quadro 5010M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTX 960A	Quadro 5010M
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Code name	GM107	N12E-Q5
Type	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	13 March 2015	22 February 2011
Pipelines	640	384
Core clock speed	1029 MHz	450 MHz
Boost Clock	1085 MHz
Transistor count	1,870 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	43.40	21.60
Floating-point performance	1,389 gflops	691.2 gflops
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.19 GB/s	83.2 GB/s
Shared memory		-
DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.0	2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	180 Mh/s
Laptop size		large
		Check Price

GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 5010M

Quadro 5010M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares