GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro M2000M
When comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Quadro M2000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro M2000M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 55 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 36% more power consumption, than Quadro M2000M.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro M2000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- Quadro M2000M has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2000M - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2000M are build with Maxwell architecture.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M2000M is 9 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro M2000M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 12 MHz higher, than Quadro M2000M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Dota 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Fortnite is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2000M in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro M2000M | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Code name | GM107 | GM107 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 October 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1197 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 43.92 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,405 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | 173 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Quadro M2000M vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro 7000
- Quadro M2000M vs Tesla C2050
- Quadro M2000M vs Quadro 7000