GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro T2000 Max Q
When comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro T2000 Max Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Quadro T2000 Max Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 960A
Quadro T2000 Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro T2000 Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro T2000 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 40 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 87% more power consumption, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Quadro T2000 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro T2000 Max Q has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 99 MHz higher, than Quadro T2000 Max Q.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Quadro T2000 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T2000 Max Q is 2988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 195% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 70% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Dota 2 is 43% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 193% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Fortnite is 142% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 186% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 58% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 210% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T2000 Max Q in World of Tanks is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Quadro T2000 Max Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Turing |
Code name | GM107 | N19P-Q3 MAX-Q |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 27 May 2019 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 930 / 1200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1500 / 1620 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 103.7 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 8000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 128.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | 7.5 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon Pro 570
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
- Quadro T2000 Max Q vs Radeon Pro 570