GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon Pro 455
When comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 455, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 455 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 455 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 455 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 455 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 455 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 455 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 455 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 455 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 174 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 455 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 12 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 455.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 455 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Dota 2 is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Far Cry 5 is 31% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Fortnite is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Grand Theft Auto V is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 455 in World of Tanks is 12% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 455 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 640 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 855 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 41.04 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,313 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | 163 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro K5000M
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI
- Radeon Pro 455 vs Quadro K5000M
- Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 480M SLI