GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon Pro 560
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon Pro 560, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 960A stacks up against Radeon Pro 560, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 560 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 560 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 560 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 75 Watt.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon Pro 560 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 560 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 560 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 560 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 122 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 560 is 68 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon Pro 560 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 21 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 907 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon Pro 560 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon Pro 560 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro P600
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce MX450
- Radeon Pro 560 vs Quadro P600
- Radeon Pro 560 vs GeForce MX450