GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon PRO WX 2100, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 960A stacks up against Radeon PRO WX 2100, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 960A
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A has 114% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 988 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 29% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 40% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 57% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 33% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 10% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 20% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
Code name | GM107 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1219 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro K2000D
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon HD 8870M
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Quadro K2000D
- Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs Radeon HD 8870M