GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon R7 M270
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R7 M270. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R7 M270. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon R7 M270 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M270 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M270 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | Not Listed |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 M270 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M270 - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 M270 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 204 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M270.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R7 M270 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2400% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 385% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M270 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 220% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 295% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 487% more, than Radeon R7 M270. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 168% more, than Radeon R7 M270. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon R7 M270 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Opal XT / Mars |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 825 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon R7 M270 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon R7 M270 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro K420
- GeForce GTX 960A vs NVS 510
- Radeon R7 M270 vs Quadro K420
- Radeon R7 M270 vs NVS 510