GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon R9 M365X
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R9 M365X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960A will be the best choice, for others Radeon R9 M365X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 960A
Radeon R9 M365X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M365X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M365X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M365X has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M365X - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 M365X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 129 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
- GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R9 M365X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 3887 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M365X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 66% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Radeon R9 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 77% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 69% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 51% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 53% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon R9 M365X. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Radeon R9 M365X | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN |
Code name | GM107 | Tropo |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 6 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1125 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 10 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Radeon R9 M365X vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Graphics 6100
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Iris Graphics 6100
- Radeon R9 M365X vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870