GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 960A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Tesla C2050
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
- Tesla C2050 has 217% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 2012 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 35% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 960A. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Tesla C2050 vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Quadro M2000M
- Tesla C2050 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL
- Tesla C2050 vs Quadro M2000M