GeForce GTX 960A vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 960A
Tesla M2070 Q
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- GeForce GTX 960A is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 4 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 960A.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 455 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- GeForce GTX 960A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960A is 1880 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 150% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Battlefield 5 is 127% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 150−160 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 54% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 960A and Tesla M2070 Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Dota 2 is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Fortnite is 68% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Forza Horizon 4 is 116% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Grand Theft Auto V is 63% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Metro Exodus is 160% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Minecraft is 20% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 45% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 122% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960A in World of Tanks is 38% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960A | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
Code name | GM107 | GF100 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 13 March 2015 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.40 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 1,389 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80.19 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | 5.0 | 2.0 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 180 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- GeForce GTX 960A vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Iris Plus Graphics G4 Ice Lake 48 EU
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon HD 8790M
- GeForce GTX 960A vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X