GeForce GTX 960M vs GRID K520
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K520 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 960M will be the best choice, for others GRID K520 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID K520
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | GRID K520 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 960M.
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and GRID K520 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K520 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and GRID K520 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and GRID K520 - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 351 MHz higher, than GRID K520.
- GeForce GTX 960M and GRID K520 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 2500 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 960M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 8% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 220−230 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| 4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 150−160 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 6% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 4% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 5% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 7% more, than GRID K520. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 960M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 960M | GRID K520 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Code name | N16P-GX | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 March 2015 | 23 July 2013 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 95.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 2x 2,448 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | 76 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| GameStream | + | |
| GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
| GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
| GameWorks | + | |
| BatteryBoost | + | |
| Check Price |