GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon R7 A265
When choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 A265, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 A265.
Radeon R7 A265
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R7 A265 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 A265 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R7 A265 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 371 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
- GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R7 A265 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 A265.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 333% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 471% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 110% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 425% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon R7 A265. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 63% more, than Radeon R7 A265. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R7 A265 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16P-GX | Opal |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | 9 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 28.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Tesla M10
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Tesla M10
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Quadro P600
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon R8 M445DX
- Radeon R7 A265 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics