GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon R9 A375
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R9 A375, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 960M stacks up against Radeon R9 A375, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 A375
GeForce GTX 960M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 960M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 960M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 960M is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and Radeon R9 A375 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 960M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 960M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 A375 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTX 960M is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon R9 A375 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 196 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
- GeForce GTX 960M and Radeon R9 A375 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 960M is 2496 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 A375.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 220−230 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 190−200 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 150−160 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon R9 A375. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 960M in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Radeon R9 A375. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 960M | Radeon R9 A375 | |
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N16P-GX | Venus |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 12 March 2015 | no data |
Pipelines | 640 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1096 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1202 MHz | 925 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 47.04 | 37.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,505 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz | 4.5 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 175 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
GameStream | + | |
GeForce ShadowPlay | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
BatteryBoost | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Tesla M10
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro P600
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Tesla M10
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro P600
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GTX 960M vs Quadro 3000M
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
- Radeon R9 A375 vs Quadro 3000M